+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: #1 reason for delicious but Less Maple-y maple syrup

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    W.Chesterfield,NH
    Posts
    81

    Default

    The trees give you what trees give you !

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Center, Underhill Ctr, VT
    Posts
    6,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucket Head View Post
    ... I was a little offended for a minute by Dr. Tim and Brian with equating light syrup coming from a superior producer with a clean and quality operation. Again, that sounded a little rough to those of us who make very little light syrup but run a pretty tight ship otherwise.
    Steve...that was not my intention and if you re-read what I wrote, I said that light syrup was "historically" thought to be higher quality. I think there is a lot less of that sentiment these days.

    There are a lot of factors that go into the color and flavor of syrup and it is certainly a very complex thing. The biggest things are sap quality (so storage temperature and conditions before being boiled) and evaporator configuration and operation.

    We've had evaporators at UVM PMRC that despite any action we took, we simply could not make light syrup. Once we changed evaporators, our syrup immediately was lighter. Some things can't easily be explained.

    In any case, dark syrup or light syrup -- all are good as long as they are proper density, free of sediment/turbidity, and have no off-flavors.

    My one pet peeve about some descriptions of darker syrup is when people say they like the "smokey" flavor. Smoke is not a natural flavor in maple syrup -- it is an off-flavor. Some people may get used to it and like it (which is normal if that is what you are used to having), but it technically is an off-flavor that should not be present.
    Dr. Tim Perkins
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Ctr
    http://www.uvm.edu/~pmrc
    https://mapleresearch.org
    Timothy.Perkins@uvm.edu

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NE Ohio, Geauga county, Montville
    Posts
    359

    Default

    [QUOTE=DrTimPerkins;415167]

    We've had evaporators at UVM PMRC that despite any action we took, we simply could not make light syrup. Once we changed evaporators, our syrup immediately was lighter. Some things can't easily be explained.

    I’ve always wondered which is actually better. A longer flue pan and shorter syrup pan or vise versa? All the manufacturers give us alot of options these days.
    12X16 Sugarhouse and 16x24 attached woodshed
    1000 taps
    120 3/16 tubing
    And still some buckets
    Becker U5.70 Rotary vane
    Leader 2X8 Reverse oil fired, Revolution Pans & Steam a way
    Lapierre Turbo 2000 600 GPH RO
    Leader Clear frame filter press
    John Deere Gator 6X4
    Indy 500 and a very large sled.
    Kubota M8200

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New Hartford, N.Y.
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Dr. Tim,

    No worries, we are good. I knew it wasn't a disparagement. I really wasn't ready to call the site owner, a team of attorneys, the news networks and my congressmen to register a complaint. Nobody listens to me anyway...

    Seriously, in all my years doing this, I never have made any true light syrup. At first, I was thinking, "What the heck?". But I stopped losing sleep over it many years ago and got over it!

    Steve
    2014 Upgrades!: 24x40 sugarhouse & 30"x10' Lapierre welded pans, wood fired w/ forced draft, homemade hood & preheater
    400 taps- half on gravity 5/16, half on gravity 3/16
    Airablo R.O. machine - in the house basement!
    Ford F-350 4x4 sap gatherer
    An assortment of barrels, cage tanks & bulk tanks- with one operational for cooling/holding concentrate
    And a few puzzled neighbors...

    http://s606.photobucket.com/albums/t...uckethead1920/

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Corbeil, Ont
    Posts
    98

    Default

    This whole thing has got me thinking about a little experiment. I want to try to make white, no cook maple syrup. The plan is to run a small amount through the RO up to about 50% sugar. Maybe have a few litres concentrated to that point. Then load that into the freeze dryer to reduce it down to syrup or sugar state. I am curious how much change in colour and taste come through without cooking. Will update once experiment complete.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North Grenville
    Posts
    1,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 4Walls View Post
    This whole thing has got me thinking about a little experiment. I want to try to make white, no cook maple syrup. The plan is to run a small amount through the RO up to about 50% sugar. Maybe have a few litres concentrated to that point. Then load that into the freeze dryer to reduce it down to syrup or sugar state. I am curious how much change in colour and taste come through without cooking. Will update once experiment complete.
    Sounds interesting!
    Been tapping since 2008.
    2018 - 17 taps/7 trees...819l sap, approx 28l syrup
    2019 - 18 taps/8 trees...585l sap, 28l syrup...21:1 ratio
    2020 - 18 taps/8 trees...890.04l sap...gave away about 170l, 30l snafu'd....23l total for me from approx 690l
    2021 - 18 taps/8 trees...395l sap, 12 l syrup
    2022 - 18 taps/8 trees....7 sugars 1 red due to #2 having surgery so had the season off....582l sap, 18.5l syrup
    2023 - 18 taps/8 trees...all sugars again. 807l sap, so far approx 14l syrup

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New Hartford, N.Y.
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Give it a try. But there won't be much color or flavor to it. It will be sweet. But without the heat, there will be no Maillard reaction taking place. Putting heat to a sugar molecule basically ruins it, but the byproduct is the brown color and flavor. So it's a nice trade off, lol.

    Steve
    2014 Upgrades!: 24x40 sugarhouse & 30"x10' Lapierre welded pans, wood fired w/ forced draft, homemade hood & preheater
    400 taps- half on gravity 5/16, half on gravity 3/16
    Airablo R.O. machine - in the house basement!
    Ford F-350 4x4 sap gatherer
    An assortment of barrels, cage tanks & bulk tanks- with one operational for cooling/holding concentrate
    And a few puzzled neighbors...

    http://s606.photobucket.com/albums/t...uckethead1920/

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christopherh View Post

    I’ve always wondered which is actually better. A longer flue pan and shorter syrup pan or vise versa? All the manufacturers give us alot of options these days.
    My understanding, from what I've read on these forums, is that evaporator configurations are designed to go with the anticipated strength of concentrate you intend to use with it. The stronger the concentrate, the greater the ratio of syrup to flue pan. Sap of higher concentrations needs more time in the pan to develop flavor, so a larger syrup pan is needed along with other adjustments such as greater sap depth.
    Last edited by ecolbeck; 04-04-2024 at 07:49 AM.
    60ish taps on buckets
    D&G Sportsman 18x63
    Turbo RB15 RO Bucket

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oneida NY
    Posts
    11,577

    Default

    Steve, I'm with you, while I have made light syrup, by far most has been amber or dark. I consider that good, when I made golden, I packed it in my best glass and it didn't sell. Was it the syrup color or the added cost of glass, I'll never know. However I ended up blending it to get Amber or Dark and it sold. The last time I ever had a request for Golden (actually when it was called light amber was my first year ever hosting a maple weekend, back about 2008 or so.
    I now sell only Amber and Dark, if any very dark is made, it becomes bourbon barrel aged maple syrup, more often dark is used because I rarely end up with very dark syrup.
    From now on my syrup will only be made from taps on my own property around the sugarhouse, in the past I had 2 leases about 5 and 7 miles away. They took so much of my effort that I didn't even tap my own trees. That was mostly because those 2 leases were in the 600-750 taps size bushes and both had vacuum. My trees at that time would have had no vacuum, I sinply didn't invest in vacuum because at that time I only had about 180 taps worth of sugar maples. Then as I lost my help as they graduated college I sold the leases and added vacuum in my own woods around the sugarhouse, initially only sugar maples but once they maxed out at about 225, I gradually added reds and only a very few silvers and I got up to about 375 I think the last year before I sold the 3x8 evaporator. Now I've ordered a 2x6 and will be converting it to oil fired, my bush has now grown enough that if I tap the max, I'll be at or near 425, about 250 sugars, 5 or 6 silvers and the rest reds.
    Last edited by maple flats; 04-04-2024 at 07:59 PM.
    Dave Klish, I recently ordered a 2x6 wood fired evaporator from A&A Sheet Metal which I will be converting to oil fired
    Now have solar, 2x6 finish pan, 5 bank 7x7 filter press, large water jacketed bottler, and tankless water heater.
    Recently bought another Gingerich RO, this one was a 125, but a second membrane was added thus is a 250, like I had.
    After running a 2x3, a 2x6, 3x8 tapping from 79 taps up to 1320 all woodfired, now I'm going to a 2x6 oil fired and a 200-425 taps.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts