+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: What is the absolute smallest vacuum pump I can run as a test?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    174

    Default What is the absolute smallest vacuum pump I can run as a test?

    I am curious how vacuum compares to gravity so I was thinking of putting 1 tap on vacuum so I can see learn how it works compared to a gravity tap in the same tree. This is mostly an experiment that I would watch in my backyard. I'm not finding any tiny vacuum pumps for potable water on google, so I'm guessing I don't know the right terminology for the pump. Any idea what kind of apparatus I could use for the experiment?
    2021: 28 taps. 18"x36" flat pan and dual natural gas burners.
    2020: 31 taps. 3 full size steam table pans on a custom 6x water heater natural gas burner setup.
    2019: 31 taps on silvers. Back porch gas cook top with 2 full size steam table pans. An amazing 14.9 gallons in my backyard!
    2018: 22 taps on 9 silvers. Propane turkey fryer and full size steam table pan on electric stove. I made 4.25 gallons in my backyard!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Exeter, Maine
    Posts
    124

    Default

    JD,

    Follow link below, this is probably the cheapest way, but doing a test on one tap isn't really going to prove much. Tie all your taps into one main, and then tie your main into the suction side of the pump. FYI. I would put a small wye strainer before the pump to prevent damage to the pump by ice/wood chips etc.. This is probably a little more than what you want to do though.

    https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/pr...dqiTGefwLdKOeI
    Three Generation Operation
    18' x 40' sugar-shack
    3' x 12' oil fired Small Brothers Raised flue
    10" full bank filter press
    1,700 on Vacuum
    500 gravity.
    Custom RO


    One great family!!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Quaker Hill, CT
    Posts
    328

    Default

    You can achieve a decent amount of vacuum with a sureflo pump or the cheap knockoff versions available on Amazon. You just need some valves and a gauge to setup a recirculation line for the pump.
    2017 25 taps on buckets got me hooked 1 gallon of sweet
    2018 51 taps on 3/16 tubing/ DIY oil tank evaporator 8.5gallons finished
    2019 60 taps 7 gallons finished ended season short
    2020 New 2x4 divided pan ready to get away from the headache that is steam table pans
    2021 off year due to pandemic and projects
    2022 back at it

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Murrysville, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    476

    Default

    UV proctor maple research has shown 4% to 6% yield increase for every inch of mercury vacuum applied at the taphole (inHg). Let's assume 5% avg for talking purposes.

    An aquatec 8852 or shurflo 4008 can pull over 20 inHG at the pump if there is sap in the lines without recirculation. Recirc is good for getting the vacuum started and reducing the surging that air in the lines can cause. Took this picture today on my aquatec setup. https://photos.app.goo.gl/pkSBpXGE38nk7Ck19

    So 20 inhg will result in 100% increase yield...double the sap!

    Now of you have any slope and are using 3/16 tubing you will easily get vacuum levels in the 28 or 29 inhg neighborhood at the taphole. I think it's 0.88in hg per foot of elevation drop, leveling out at 29-30 in hg max. Thats 150% increase in yield.

    My experience on my setups (aquatec and shurflo pumps using 3/16 with good elevation drop)it has easily hit that 150% increase in yield from my red maples (which can be very finicky when not on vacuum).

    Don't bother with a test. Plenty of data shows that if done right you will get much higher yields.

    I know its not a controlled experiment but after I went to vacuum I got over 3 times that of my neighbor who normally got very similar sap flow per tap to me for years.
    Last edited by DRoseum; 02-18-2022 at 06:22 PM.
    D. Roseum
    www.roseummaple.com
    ~100 taps on 3/16 custom temp controlled vacuum; shurflo vacuum #2; custom nat gas evap with auto-drawoff and tank level gas shut-off controller; homemade RO #1; homemade RO #2; SL SS filter press
    2021: 27.1 gallons
    2022: 35 gallons

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Princeton, MA
    Posts
    495

    Default

    I have experimented with the cheap 1gpm diaphragm pumps and I was not impressed. They will pump liquid OK but I was not able to pull a steady vacuum with them. It surges a lot, which is a bad thing for a sap line. I really wanted to make it work for vacuum but it didn't. Better off going with a 4008 or similar which are known to work.

    Dave
    Mountain Maple farm
    2022 NAMSC award winning dark amber syrup
    2023: 320 taps, 70% red maples. Mountain Maple S4 diaphragm pump controller with automated sap transfer and text messaging
    Website:
    https://www.mountainmaplefarm.com
    https://www.facebook.com/MountainMapleFarm/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Amount of sap can vary on different taps in the same tree even just on buckets. Putting vac on one tap will also decrease the sap on the tap without vacuum.
    Smoky Lake 2x6 dropflu pans and hoods on homemade arch
    Smoky Lake 6 gallon water jacked bottler
    Concentric Exhaust
    250 Deer Run RO
    325 taps

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Center, Underhill Ctr, VT
    Posts
    6,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Super Sapper View Post
    Amount of sap can vary on different taps in the same tree even just on buckets. Putting vac on one tap will also decrease the sap on the tap without vacuum.
    Correct. Comparing two taps in the same tree is not a real good approach to comparing yield.

    Think of the tree as a pipe stuck in the ground filled with water. You put in two holes close to each other. On one you let the water run out freely. On the other you pull it out with vacuum. Which will produce more water? Will they interfere with each other? Absolutely...the second hole will produce far less than it would have if there were no second hole (on vacuum or even not on vacuum).

    When we put 1 tap in a tree of about 18" diameter and pull a good vacuum (25" Hg), we might get X gallons of sap. If we put 2 taps in the same tree, we get a total of about X gallons of sap, but each tap will produce about 0.5X (on average). Just because you have 2 holes doesn't mean you're going to get double the amount of sap (on vacuum). On gravity the situation is a bit different.
    Dr. Tim Perkins
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Ctr
    http://www.uvm.edu/~pmrc
    https://mapleresearch.org
    Timothy.Perkins@uvm.edu

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Thanks everyone for the ideas and info. I already have a pump with my RO Bucket which is similar to the Aquatec. I was worried it would pull too much vacuum (or too much sap) and harm the tree, so that's why I was looking for a small pump. I guess I could have some kind of adjustable air valve in the system that would allow me to decrease the suction.
    My backyard is flat with the massive trees 50' apart. It would take a whole roll of tubing to connect them all, another reason why I was going to just play around with 1 tree. Today we got 1-2" of rain and the chance to avoid walking through the soggy ground is looking better and better.
    2021: 28 taps. 18"x36" flat pan and dual natural gas burners.
    2020: 31 taps. 3 full size steam table pans on a custom 6x water heater natural gas burner setup.
    2019: 31 taps on silvers. Back porch gas cook top with 2 full size steam table pans. An amazing 14.9 gallons in my backyard!
    2018: 22 taps on 9 silvers. Propane turkey fryer and full size steam table pan on electric stove. I made 4.25 gallons in my backyard!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Center, Underhill Ctr, VT
    Posts
    6,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jdircksen View Post
    I was worried it would pull too much vacuum (or too much sap) and harm the tree, so that's why I was looking for a small pump.
    Vacuum at any level applied to a taphole will not harm a tree. While animal cells will rupture from a vacuum, plant cells are different. They are surrounded by a cell wall, which prevents them from being pulled apart to the point where they break. The internal wound and taphole closure are no different between vacuum and gravity collection. Sap sugar content is also not different. What is different is the sap volume?

    Morselli (UVM) demonstrated this years ago up to a vacuum level of 15" Hg. She measured sap chemistry and concluded there was no cellular injury. They couldn't get a vacuum higher than that at the time, so the recommendation to not pull vacuum beyond 15" Hg sort of got stuck in people's minds. We did a study at UVM PMRC in 2007 looking at it and found the same results, but we went up to 25" Hg (as high as we could pull at the time). We also cut up trees and looked at the internal wounding. https://mapleresearch.org/pub/m1007s...onvacuumlevel/

    This is the basis for the rule of 5-7% increase in sap yield per inch Hg of vacuum.

    These results were confirmed a few years ago by both Cornell and Centre Acer.

    The size of the vacuum pump has nothing to do with sap flow or wounding. The differential in pressure drives sap flow, so the higher the differential (inside the tree compared to outside the tree on gravity, or inside the tubing if on vacuum). The size of the pump is more related to ability to how efficiently you can move out large quantities of air (CFM capacity). Some pumps will move a lot of air, but can't generate high vacuum. Others can generate high vacuum (on a small tubing system), but can't move much air. Pumps that move a decent amount of air but can do so to high vacuum levels are what we're really after.
    Last edited by DrTimPerkins; 02-22-2022 at 03:27 PM.
    Dr. Tim Perkins
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Ctr
    http://www.uvm.edu/~pmrc
    https://mapleresearch.org
    Timothy.Perkins@uvm.edu

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts