+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Baffles lengthwise or crosswise?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Muskoka
    Posts
    9

    Default Baffles lengthwise or crosswise?

    We are taking the next step from our block rocket stove evaporator setup for next season. I've welded two barrels together, installed a barrel stove kit and will be fitting a ramp.

    I plan on making a 304 stainless continuous feed flat bottom pan 18" x 48". It will have a draw-off valve at either end so the pan can be reversed each day, drawing off at the door end. The feed will be by drip from a warming coil around the chimney stack. The coil will be fed directly from the RO output.

    I'm not sure if the baffles are better run cross-wise or length-wise, I've seen pictures of both but no information about the advantages or disadvantages. The pan size would lend itself nicely to two lengthwise baffles forming 6" wide channels or 5 crosswise baffles forming 8" wide channels.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Nashville, MI
    Posts
    942

    Default

    Most pans I have seen for what you are describing the dividers are running lengthwise. Your idea for the draw off and rotating is very good.
    2004 - 2012 2x3 flat pan 25 to 60 taps
    2012 2x3 new divided pan w/draw off 55 taps
    2018 - didn't boil surgery - bought new evaporator
    2019 new SML 2x4 raised flue high output evap. 65 taps
    made 17 gal. syrup
    2020 - only put out 53 taps - made 16.25 ga.l syrup
    2021 - Didn't work out
    2022 - 25 taps on bags / 8 taps on 3/16's line - late start

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oneida NY
    Posts
    11,566

    Default

    For a single pan either will work good and drawing near the door OK.
    Evaporators with a flue pan and a syrup pan, on most newer evaporators try to draw off at the back of the syrup pan, where the heat is more constant. Personally I prefer cross flow over lengthwise flow, especially if you draw at the back. Most of the issue is with lengthwise channels, the outside channel, where you have your draw off is not as hot because the sides overlap onto the edge iron of the arch.
    Dave Klish, I recently ordered a 2x6 wood fired evaporator from A&A Sheet Metal which I will be converting to oil fired
    Now have solar, 2x6 finish pan, 5 bank 7x7 filter press, large water jacketed bottler, and tankless water heater.
    Recently bought another Gingerich RO, this one was a 125, but a second membrane was added thus is a 250, like I had.
    After running a 2x3, a 2x6, 3x8 tapping from 79 taps up to 1320 all woodfired, now I'm going to a 2x6 oil fired and a 200-425 taps.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Muskoka
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maple flats View Post
    For a single pan either will work good and drawing near the door OK.
    Evaporators with a flue pan and a syrup pan, on most newer evaporators try to draw off at the back of the syrup pan, where the heat is more constant. Personally I prefer cross flow over lengthwise flow, especially if you draw at the back. Most of the issue is with lengthwise channels, the outside channel, where you have your draw off is not as hot because the sides overlap onto the edge iron of the arch.
    I guess it wouldn't be a problem to draw at the back. Just have to extend the line from the pre-warming coil.

    Thanks all for the input.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oneida NY
    Posts
    11,566

    Default

    I really like drawing from the back better, but my pan is switchable draw, same side. I just close one valve and open another. I then need to move the float from one draw off to the other and because I use an auto draw I switch the wires on the control. I have 2 temp probes, one at each draw off, when I change it takes only a few seconds and I'm ready. I most often run on the back draw about twice as long as I do on the front draw.
    Dave Klish, I recently ordered a 2x6 wood fired evaporator from A&A Sheet Metal which I will be converting to oil fired
    Now have solar, 2x6 finish pan, 5 bank 7x7 filter press, large water jacketed bottler, and tankless water heater.
    Recently bought another Gingerich RO, this one was a 125, but a second membrane was added thus is a 250, like I had.
    After running a 2x3, a 2x6, 3x8 tapping from 79 taps up to 1320 all woodfired, now I'm going to a 2x6 oil fired and a 200-425 taps.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Muskoka
    Posts
    9

    Default

    So I decided to try crosswise, with eight 6" wide channels. Same effective length as three lengthwise channels, the advantage of evening out the heat across each channel and potentially stiffer construction. I'm using 18 gauge 304 stainless (308 SS mig wire). Outer pan walls are 6" deep, baffles are 4" deep.



    Then I realized that I need an odd number of channels, not baffles, so that the valves will be on opposite sides to make the pan reversible. Doh! Good thing it's just tacked up at the moment. I guess I have some grinding to do in the morning...

    Once I correct that, the plan is to finish welding everything up, fill it with some sugar water and test fire. Whichever end runs hotter will be designated the sap end.

    Still have to put in the ramp, but here's the progress thus far on the barrel stove this is intended to fit:

    Last edited by torch; 09-25-2020 at 02:15 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oneida NY
    Posts
    11,566

    Default

    Ouch, that hurts.
    Dave Klish, I recently ordered a 2x6 wood fired evaporator from A&A Sheet Metal which I will be converting to oil fired
    Now have solar, 2x6 finish pan, 5 bank 7x7 filter press, large water jacketed bottler, and tankless water heater.
    Recently bought another Gingerich RO, this one was a 125, but a second membrane was added thus is a 250, like I had.
    After running a 2x3, a 2x6, 3x8 tapping from 79 taps up to 1320 all woodfired, now I'm going to a 2x6 oil fired and a 200-425 taps.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wardensville, Wv
    Posts
    326

    Default

    before i started making syrup i saw a pan constructed like this, two gentleman in their 80's boiled on it. The arch was made of parts from an old steam boiler, the cold sap went in on the end you fed the fire, and the draw off was on the end next to the stack. They controlled the sap flow in with a water faucet that look as old as the sugar makers, lol.
    2024 - 57 Gallons - Short season, many and varied problems remedied in short order! - No buckets!
    2023 - 38 Gallons - RO broke, Buckets didn't run, rebuilt vacuum pump mid-season, still made good syrup!
    2022 - 52 Gallons - DIY RO, 50% less fuel, no late nights in the shack!
    2021 - 48 Gallons - new pans, new arch, lots of new taps and tubing
    2020 - 32 Gallons
    2019 - 27 Gallons

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Muskoka
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Well I guess that means it worked. To some degree, anyway.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Muskoka
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Update:

    Pan MkII has a wider section at either end to facilitate drawing off. This time I cut it all out of a single sheet and had a local HVAC contractor bend it up on their box brake. That way I only had to weld the 4 corners. Much faster and easier. I also had them fold a hem on the top of all 4 sides, stiffening them up better. And finally, I had them fold the edges of the baffles so I could make smoother spot welds for easier cleaning:



    Overall, it works pretty well:



    Having a little trouble getting enough heat to the back though. It just simmers gently, doesn't really boil. I'm going to have to tinker with the slope of the flue under the pan I think. So for now, we're drawing at the front:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts