+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: 400 gpm RO

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Parallel or series will give you the same flow rate (gallons per hour). Series will allow the batch to flow across all three membranes, which reduces fouling and helps keep the membranes flushed. There is no benefit to a parallel configuration in these little systems.

    Running a series system from 2-4% will be the same flow rate as running a parallel system from 2-4%. With a series system, you can run the water a little faster than the concentrate (but you wouldn't have to), and you could get a higher single pass concentration with less likelihood of fouling membranes (than a parallel system). Each 400gpd membrane will pass 4 gallons of water per hour at sap temp and 100psi (less than 100psi is not really satisfactory).

    The aquatec 8800 is really only capable or running up to 600-800 gpd of membranes. The flow rate at 100psi is only around 16gph. The 8855 series could run three. Plan on about 24gph with 3 400gpd membranes and a sufficient pump (making 12gph of concentrate and 12gph of permeate). If you get to 150psi you might be able to do a little better (but the 8800 will probably only make 80-100psi with three membranes).

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Norway, Maine
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carls47807 View Post
    Parallel or series will give you the same flow rate (gallons per hour). Series will allow the batch to flow across all three membranes, which reduces fouling and helps keep the membranes flushed. There is no benefit to a parallel configuration in these little systems.

    Running a series system from 2-4% will be the same flow rate as running a parallel system from 2-4%. With a series system, you can run the water a little faster than the concentrate (but you wouldn't have to), and you could get a higher single pass concentration with less likelihood of fouling membranes (than a parallel system). Each 400gpd membrane will pass 4 gallons of water per hour at sap temp and 100psi (less than 100psi is not really satisfactory).

    The aquatec 8800 is really only capable or running up to 600-800 gpd of membranes. The flow rate at 100psi is only around 16gph. The 8855 series could run three. Plan on about 24gph with 3 400gpd membranes and a sufficient pump (making 12gph of concentrate and 12gph of permeate). If you get to 150psi you might be able to do a little better (but the 8800 will probably only make 80-100psi with three membranes).
    Great info carls47807, really appreciate the feedback. If I am trying to match my 15-20 gph rig, how could I successfully build a system that would process that even if it were at a lower concentrate level? Maybe multiple pumps and 4 membranes? Because I am a weekend warrior unless we get a really big run and I go up mid-week, my RO has to do a fairly good job of keeping up. I could mix it obviously with regular sap, and maybe that's the answer, but if I at least wanted to take off half the water what would be your suggestion?

    Thanks!

    Tucker
    Tucker Adams

    2022 - 105 Taps, 58 on buckets, 40 on shurflo, 5 on 3/16 gravity across southern Maine with primary bush in Norway. Aiming for 30 Gallons this Year.
    2021 - 64 Taps in Norway, ME (mostly on 3/16 tubing) - 16 gallons with a 225 gallon sap donation.
    2x4 AOF/AUF Oil Drum Evaporator with Badgerland Pan
    1/2 finished 12x16 Sugar Shack

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    124

    Default

    You could run two aquatec 8800 pumps, with 2 membranes on each (two separate systems basically). RO Bucket (me, but I am not soliciting), sells a 40gph booster pump that pairs well with 3 membranes. Also have a 60gph pump that can run up to 5 membranes. Again, each membrane will get you 8gph. Hope this helps!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Tioga county, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Take a look at Mattatuckmadnessmaple.

    He has a lot of useful info on these small systems. He is a member on here, so you can probably find it using the search engine on here. I think his user name is something like hubador.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Weston, CT
    Posts
    474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muddy Bottoms View Post
    Take a look at Mattatuckmadnessmaple.He

    He has a lot of useful info on these small systems. He is a member on here, so you can probably find it using the search engine on here. I think his user name is something like hubador.
    Mattatuckmadness also uses series and discourages the use of parallel. I think he uses 5 or 6 150GPD in series.

    Another benefit to series is that you can more effectively rotate membranes between runs from first to last down the line so you even out fowling of each membrane.
    If you think it's easy to make good money in maple syrup .... then your obviously good at stealing somebody's Maple Syrup.

    Favorite Tree: Sugar Maple
    Most Hated Animal: Sap Sucker
    Most Loved Animal: Devon Rex Cat
    Favorite Kingpin: Bruce Bascom
    40 Sugar Maple Taps ... 23 in CT and 17 in NY .... 29 on gravity tubing and 11 on 5G buckets ... 2019 Totals 508 gallons of sap, 7 boils, 11.4 gallons of syrup.
    1 Girlfriend that gives away all my syrup to her friends.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    vermont
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Just a heads up on this topic. I found myself fighting for a faster flow rate. I used 4x 150gpd ro membranes in series. It was super duper slow. I then cut it in half basically. 2 in series x 2... still not fast enough... .so I did the one pass on each from pump to membrane and out with 4 pin pressure needles valves. What I needed to accomplish was - evaporation rate needed to equal processing -evap-rate. I was able to boil so fast my ro couldn't keep up. I'd sometimes not use ro at all. Some trees were giving me 5-6% so i didn't process it through RO. I'm a one man operation so I needed to tilt things to one and done methodology. Just an fyi I tried to keep the flow rates equal water to perm on each membrane. I might take the extra time to process my perm one more time before boiling but again-my starcat evaps so fast... It's almost pointless with only 60 taps. The starcat with blower evaps 11.5 gal per hour. On a good day I'll only collect about 90 gal of sap. On these days I'd be running ro and evaping that as fast as possible but I nearly always had to add sap to keep my boiling going and not burning the pan. Basic thing to keep in mind-evap rate vs ro process rate. I don't let my sap sit around and/or freeze. that's another issue altogether... ro outside will freeze overnight or in an unheated garage.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts