+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Paraformaldehyde found in Quebec

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Lanark, ON
    Posts
    2,394

    Default

    jmayerl,

    Not exactly. You said your syrup was better than Canadian syrup because of what's gone on in the Federation. Ontario and New Brunswick are each about equivalent to New York in total syrup produced per year but are not at all involved with the Quebec Federation so you can't lump us with Quebec. We go to great lengths to differentiate our locally produced syrup in Ontario as a large percentage of the syrup sold here comes from Quebec too - Ontario is a net importer of syrup as demand exceeds supply.

    I don't agree that the Federation should allow contaminated syrup to enter the food chain - it should be dumped. I know Ontario forces some syrup to be dumped each year because of higher than permissible lead levels because our Ministry of Agriculture and Food is very pro-active at monitoring food safety. They would never allow it to be sold as sub-standard syrup so it can be diluted and re-processed.
    4,600 Taps on vacuum
    9,400 gallons storage
    3 tower CDL RO
    3.5'x14' Lapierre Force 5
    Twitter & Instagram: @ennismaple
    www.ennismaple.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Duxbury, VT
    Posts
    416

    Default

    The thing that jumped out at me, and many have already pointed out is that they still bought the syrup???????????????????????????????????

    So we are commending them on "quality control" in QC??????????????????????? Sure they caught the breach by the producer. But...

    To me they are failing the maple industry and consumer by buying this syrup.

    They blend it all anyway to control taste right? It would make perfect sense that this good tasting Commercial Syrup will be blended with other good syrup and find it's way into a crap brown colored QC container and on a shelf in the US?????

    Why wouldn't they dump that producers syrup and make an example out of them so others will get the memo.

    I mean they are willing to (in my opinion) steal another producers entire crop because they try to enter the free market and not sell to the Fed. Now the Fed is standing by a producer that is also breaking the law by buying their poison syrup.

    With all the terrible press the Fed is getting, spoofs on TV and even a movie coming I think, I wonder how long for this world the Fed is?

    Ben

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Milan Qc
    Posts
    551

    Default

    I think you dont understand my explanation. The Qc Fed. want to refuse the syrup, but they cannot rely the tap contamination found to the syrup produced, so as per Canadian laws (federal government, The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ) the syrup is not found contaminated, and they are forced to accept it.
    The penalty of dropping grade to commercial is the more they can apply in this cases. If they had found any or enough trace of Paraformaldéhide in the syrup, they could apply the Federal law and dump it, and they re will be happy to do it.

    Some producers on our forum suggest to give the Federation the capacity to remove quotas to these cheaters, we dont need them...
    Last edited by CBOYER; 05-01-2014 at 09:50 AM. Reason: add info
    200 Buckets 2015
    14 x 16 Cabane à sucre
    2 x 5 Cantin evaporator

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Center, Underhill Ctr, VT
    Posts
    6,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CBOYER View Post
    ...so as per Canadian laws (federal government, The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ) the syrup is not found contaminated, and they are forced to accept it.
    The U.S. EPA regulates pesticides used in food manufacturing and any residues therein. PFA was at one time an allowed pesticide in maple production. I believe the way the regulations read here is that nothing beyond what is "naturally-occurring" is allowed. If there is knowledge and evidence that PFA was actually used, I wonder how the EPA would interpret and apply that rule.
    Dr. Tim Perkins
    UVM Proctor Maple Research Ctr
    http://www.uvm.edu/~pmrc
    https://mapleresearch.org
    Timothy.Perkins@uvm.edu

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Poultney VT
    Posts
    2,420

    Default

    knowingly and allowing a carcinogen to be mixed in with all other good syrup produced should make all that syrup worth 1.00 a pound,

    please set me straight US farmers, If one dairy farmer contaminates the whole truck load of milk he buys it and it gets dumped on the ground? this is how I understand it.
    So if thats true so should all the syrup contaminated by a know carcinogen
    Business Name
    Flat Lander Sugaring (who would think a guy from Az be making syrup)
    125 on Sap Suckers
    Close to 475 High Vac
    400 gravity adding more
    leader 2x6
    home made preheater
    hoods
    1 7D749 for AOF
    New FLS Tsunami Arch
    4 membrane TR Industries RO 2HP 3 phase 601GPH 250 PSI
    PID Display for Arch Temp.
    Chumlee of the trader

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    DeKalb, NY
    Posts
    1,707

    Default

    please set me straight US farmers, If one dairy farmer contaminates the whole truck load of milk he buys it and it gets dumped on the ground? this is how I understand it.
    So if thats true so should all the syrup contaminated by a know carcinogen[/QUOTE]

    That is true if the level of the contaminant is high enough. What they are saying in this instance is that there was no detectable level of paraformeldahyde that was greater than what might have occurred naturally detected. I know of dairy farmers who brag that "dilution is the solution" for antibiotics in milk.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    NE Pa
    Posts
    2,209

    Default

    CBOYER- Havent I seen you post on here tons of times that Canada makes real maple syrup and everybody in the states are deliberately trying to poisen small children and kill thousands of people by using one galvanized elbow somewhere on some plumbing? Now your making excuses for using pills in tapholes and even worse finding it and still using it? Seriously?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Verona, NY
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PATheron View Post
    CBOYER- Havent I seen you post on here tons of times that Canada makes real maple syrup and everybody in the states are deliberately trying to poisen small children and kill thousands of people by using one galvanized elbow somewhere on some plumbing? Now your making excuses for using pills in tapholes and even worse finding it and still using it? Seriously?
    not to add to the prodding, but when I was up there a couple weeks ago I saw a lot of galvanized, and one place with some pans that im pretty sure had to be lead soldered. the federation still uses galvanized barrels too, saw that in the packing plant. realistically, we are all still in the same transition stage of galvanized to stainless.
    7000 taps on vacuum, just trying to get a little better every year.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Milan Qc
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PATheron View Post
    CBOYER- Havent I seen you post on here tons of times that Canada makes real maple syrup and everybody in the states are deliberately trying to poisen small children and kill thousands of people by using one galvanized elbow somewhere on some plumbing? Now your making excuses for using pills in tapholes and even worse finding it and still using it? Seriously?
    Mr Pat, first i never make excuse for those cheaters: i try to explain what happens and whats are the laws and rules apply by the differents authorithies. If your authorithies doesnt make test for PFA at tapping, they cannot find them...On this case they cannot rely the spraying of a PFA solution in a tap (no pill involved) to syrup produced. And i think that you generalize and amplify things about poisoning: i had make a remark about a very nice complete ss operation that finish in a Galv. elbow...Why ??
    Please dont be like the reporters, and read correctly my posts.
    200 Buckets 2015
    14 x 16 Cabane à sucre
    2 x 5 Cantin evaporator

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Campbellford, on
    Posts
    682

    Default

    I think it is very nieeve to believe that this problem is isolated to Quebec. The only reason we are discussing it is that Quebec is so vigilant about testing for it. I think this should be seen as an eye opener that these problems exist in our industry regardless of where we are located and that everything must be done by all stake holders to eliminate them. Lets work together and not point fingers.
    Maple Rock Farm
    www.Maplerockfarm.ca
    400 taps on Vacuum
    18”x60” Lapierre propane evaporator with Smokey Lake auto draw off
    Homemade 3 post RO with MES membranes
    Ford TS110 tractor sap hauler

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts