SilverLeaf
04-19-2010, 10:03 AM
2010 was my first year boiling on a real evap, rather than my prior crude setup, which involved way too many stovepots. It was sure fun to see 'er roar! :D
Wondering though if I can get some feedback on my stack temps. My setup is essentially a 2x6 flat pan (there's no flue pan). I do not have a blower and was just relying on my 10" stack to generate the draft (I kept the firebox door open a crack too to help.) With this setup, I was generally getting 12-14 gallons per hour and as a general rule kept the stack temp around 1200-1400.
What surprised me was that the only way I could get a really good boil all the way to the back of the pan was to get that stack temp up to about 1800. At the 1200-1400 range where I normally kept it, the back two feet of the pan were bubbling a little bit but never giving me that rolling boil that we all lust after.
Everything I've been led to believe is that 1800 degrees in the stack is just plain wasteful because too much heat is being lost. Why, then, would I need to get it that hot to get my entire pan to boil? :confused: Any thoughts?
One other note: The area under the rear 3 feet of my pan is filled with vermiculite to bring the level up closer to the pan. But there's still 4" of clearance between it and that pan. So that leaves 96 square inches of space for the hot gases to make their way to the stack, which is plenty big enough for my 10" stack (which if my math is correct is about 78.5 square inches), so I know that the problem is not that I'm prematurely "pinching off" the hot gases or anything like that.
Wondering though if I can get some feedback on my stack temps. My setup is essentially a 2x6 flat pan (there's no flue pan). I do not have a blower and was just relying on my 10" stack to generate the draft (I kept the firebox door open a crack too to help.) With this setup, I was generally getting 12-14 gallons per hour and as a general rule kept the stack temp around 1200-1400.
What surprised me was that the only way I could get a really good boil all the way to the back of the pan was to get that stack temp up to about 1800. At the 1200-1400 range where I normally kept it, the back two feet of the pan were bubbling a little bit but never giving me that rolling boil that we all lust after.
Everything I've been led to believe is that 1800 degrees in the stack is just plain wasteful because too much heat is being lost. Why, then, would I need to get it that hot to get my entire pan to boil? :confused: Any thoughts?
One other note: The area under the rear 3 feet of my pan is filled with vermiculite to bring the level up closer to the pan. But there's still 4" of clearance between it and that pan. So that leaves 96 square inches of space for the hot gases to make their way to the stack, which is plenty big enough for my 10" stack (which if my math is correct is about 78.5 square inches), so I know that the problem is not that I'm prematurely "pinching off" the hot gases or anything like that.