seandicare
03-07-2016, 08:37 PM
i volunteered to run a test for Stephen Childs on how 3/16 compares to 5/16 when using a bucket under each tap instead of continuous line.
well, finally got my first sap today.......probably 13-14 gals off @28 taps
the test didn't go as i thought between the 3/16 and 5/16.......5 taps of 3/16 and 4 taps of 5/16(could not find the last tree i tapped, too dark) i used weight instead of gallons, just because it is quicker and easier to measure with a fish scale.
3/16-5 taps gave 13lbs 07oz
5/16-4 taps gave 22lbs 01oz
all the tree were between 10-12 inch diam and tried to scatter pretty evenly.....if i put one size in a spot i tried to set the other close too it.
i did notice some of the 3/16 , that were not part of test, had alot more sap than others. probably difference in trees , though
i will continue keeping track and give updates on what i find.
well, finally got my first sap today.......probably 13-14 gals off @28 taps
the test didn't go as i thought between the 3/16 and 5/16.......5 taps of 3/16 and 4 taps of 5/16(could not find the last tree i tapped, too dark) i used weight instead of gallons, just because it is quicker and easier to measure with a fish scale.
3/16-5 taps gave 13lbs 07oz
5/16-4 taps gave 22lbs 01oz
all the tree were between 10-12 inch diam and tried to scatter pretty evenly.....if i put one size in a spot i tried to set the other close too it.
i did notice some of the 3/16 , that were not part of test, had alot more sap than others. probably difference in trees , though
i will continue keeping track and give updates on what i find.