Polish Wizard
02-08-2016, 08:50 PM
Thanks to a good friend's efforts, we're building an arch from a lateral file cabinet.
We built a very heavy 6" high I-beam frame to sit on top of the file cabinet, then we cut a hole in the cabinet's top sheet metal for heat to contact the 3 buffet pans we plan to sit into the heavy frame.
We added a horizontal baffle inside the cabinet.
This means the wood fire will be under the baffle.
All heat and smoke will travel to one end of the cabinet, rise through a hole in the baffle, and pass under the buffet pans to reach the flue at the opposite end of the cabinet.
We won't have direct flame impingement on the pans, but I'm sure it will be quite hot.
We're also adding AUF on a rheostat.
My question is --- what depth buffet pans should I buy?
I anticipated 6" so a hard boil won't overflow the pans, it will be easier to ladle out the contents during a boil, and it will be the most side contact for heat transfer.
But --- will 6" be too much side metal and cause sap to burn inside the pans?
Will 4" be a better choice, and still be suitable for a quicker cooking process?
I was cautioned to only have a couple inches of liquid in my pans, which started making me wonder about the depth of pans.
We built a very heavy 6" high I-beam frame to sit on top of the file cabinet, then we cut a hole in the cabinet's top sheet metal for heat to contact the 3 buffet pans we plan to sit into the heavy frame.
We added a horizontal baffle inside the cabinet.
This means the wood fire will be under the baffle.
All heat and smoke will travel to one end of the cabinet, rise through a hole in the baffle, and pass under the buffet pans to reach the flue at the opposite end of the cabinet.
We won't have direct flame impingement on the pans, but I'm sure it will be quite hot.
We're also adding AUF on a rheostat.
My question is --- what depth buffet pans should I buy?
I anticipated 6" so a hard boil won't overflow the pans, it will be easier to ladle out the contents during a boil, and it will be the most side contact for heat transfer.
But --- will 6" be too much side metal and cause sap to burn inside the pans?
Will 4" be a better choice, and still be suitable for a quicker cooking process?
I was cautioned to only have a couple inches of liquid in my pans, which started making me wonder about the depth of pans.